A state bankruptcy when it cannot fulfill his commitments current, and in addition does not have sufficient the financial credibility so that, if emits debt, this one is bought.
I have always maintained that a western state cannot break, and therefore that the pensions are assured. Another thing would suppose that the state cannot fulfill its commitments. The same fodder of the payment of the debt. Although to some it bothers to them, here we called banana republics to the corrupt ones and that they do not fulfill its commitments. If they have discounted the quotes to me, they must pay the pensions to me (good slogan for a manifestation, the verse has been unexpected). It comes with regard to which in one of the outstanding in the interview to Elena Salgado that publishes the WORLD Sunday 29 of November is read very textually: “I do not believe that it is going to never break a country of the Euro by the system of mutual aid”. It means.
That they have but posiblidades to break the countries that do not belong to the Eoropea Community: Norway or Sweden.
That they have but possibilities of breaking the countries, that belonging to the Community, are not of zonaEuro: Great Britain.
That Spain has the possibility of breaking and that would save the “mutual system to us of aid”?
That their words badly have been interpreted and does not exist the risk of bankruptcy of Spain? (it could save Catalonia to us and the Corner of Cartagena)
Photo of country in bankruptcy risk.
I hope that, as usual, it is rectified, from now until little.